NASA Analysis Report for OHG117 ($19FEB05XA) This report is a contributed analysis report that does not correspond to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by David Gordon, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: OHIGGINS has a +2.0 second clock offset, apriori term set in NuSolve. YARRA12M small clock breaks at ~00:30 and ~11:10 UTC. No met data for HOBART26. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 2023 scheduled 2016 correlated (in database) 1949 recoverable (usable) 1878 used Session fit: 52.030 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA 352 319 301 85.5% HART15M 470 459 447 95.1% HOBART26 618 612 591 95.6% KATH12M 621 605 591 95.2% KOKEE 499 481 465 93.2% OHIGGINS 317 312 300 94.6% SYOWA 514 473 447 87.0% YARRA12M 655 637 614 93.7% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 2023 1949 1878 92.8% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0003-066 58 58 58 100.0% 0106+013 9 9 8 88.9% 0119+115 6 6 5 83.3% 0138-097 3 3 2 66.7% 0234+285 42 42 39 92.9% 0235+164 24 24 18 75.0% 0308-611 12 12 12 100.0% 0405-385 12 9 8 66.7% 0454-234 217 217 204 94.0% 0454-463 40 40 40 100.0% 0458-020 58 58 57 98.3% 0605-085 85 85 75 88.2% 0648-165 6 6 6 100.0% 0723-008 85 85 73 85.9% 0727-115 98 98 93 94.9% 0748+126 30 30 28 93.3% OJ287 42 42 42 100.0% 0906+015 27 27 23 85.2% 1034-293 6 6 2 33.3% 1055+018 114 114 113 99.1% 1124-186 12 12 12 100.0% 1156+295 15 15 15 100.0% 3C279 116 116 111 95.7% 1424-418 266 266 253 95.1% 1502+106 30 30 26 86.7% 1546+027 18 18 16 88.9% 1611+343 18 18 18 100.0% NRAO530 111 111 107 96.4% 1741-038 100 100 100 100.0% 1749+096 63 63 60 95.2% 1751+288 3 3 3 100.0% 1908-201 15 15 15 100.0% 1936-155 42 42 39 92.9% 2121+053 18 18 15 83.3% 2134+00 39 37 29 74.4% 2145+067 45 45 41 91.1% 2149-306 36 36 17 47.2% 2155-152 12 10 9 75.0% 3C446 12 12 12 100.0% 2227-088 66 66 62 93.9% CTA102 12 12 12 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 2023 2016 1878 92.8% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA-HART15M 121 118 114 94.2% FORTLEZA-HOBART26 6 6 6 100.0% FORTLEZA-KATH12M 1 1 DESELECTED 0.0% FORTLEZA-KOKEE 14 12 11 78.6% FORTLEZA-OHIGGINS 80 78 77 96.2% FORTLEZA-SYOWA 108 88 79 73.1% FORTLEZA-YARRA12M 22 16 14 63.6% HART15M-HOBART26 33 33 33 100.0% HART15M-KATH12M 40 38 38 95.0% HART15M-KOKEE 0 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% HART15M-OHIGGINS 72 71 70 97.2% HART15M-SYOWA 139 134 128 92.1% HART15M-YARRA12M 65 65 64 98.5% HOBART26-KATH12M 182 180 177 97.3% HOBART26-KOKEE 153 153 147 96.1% HOBART26-OHIGGINS 28 28 26 92.9% HOBART26-SYOWA 52 48 46 88.5% HOBART26-YARRA12M 164 164 156 95.1% KATH12M-KOKEE 151 145 143 94.7% KATH12M-OHIGGINS 20 20 20 100.0% KATH12M-SYOWA 52 48 46 88.5% KATH12M-YARRA12M 175 173 167 95.4% KOKEE-OHIGGINS 27 27 23 85.2% KOKEE-SYOWA 20 17 17 85.0% KOKEE-YARRA12M 134 127 124 92.5% OHIGGINS-SYOWA 69 67 63 91.3% OHIGGINS-YARRA12M 21 21 21 100.0% SYOWA-YARRA12M 74 71 68 91.9% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 2023 1949 1878 92.8% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.